Skip to main content

Full text of "STENOGRAPHIC NOTES OF CONVERSATION BETWEEN DCI AND DOUGLAS FAIRBANKS"

See other formats


STENOGRAPHIC NOTES OF CONVERSATION BETWEEN DCI AND DOUGLAS 
FAIRBANKS ON 2 DECEMBER 1957 AT 1215 HOURS 


F- "... speaking up at Oxford next week end. He said, 'I 
respect George ... and I know him, I have great respect 
for him. It*s terribly difficult to speak with two 
different views from the same platform at Oxford University." 

D- "George— did you see George?" 

F- "Yes." 

D- "I don’t know quite what George is driving at, you know, 

I mean, what does all this mean. There was quite a—." 

F- "I saw—." 

D- "To-do here in the, I think it was in the Times ." 

F- "Yes, I saw the •••, it was in the Times ." 

D- "No, it was in the Post . I guess." 

F- "There is one in the Times in the inside." 

D- "In the Times . too, yes." 

F- "Well, he* s spelled out his reasons. Like every view, 

there are two sides to it. I think that there is something 
to be said for considering a phase of what he proposes. 

After all, certainly very few people know the subject 
better than what he does." 

D- "Yes." 


naBuwsrr no. - — — — 

HO CHAKOC T* CMS*. □ 
p UiCUSSlFtEB 
«LMS. mUHS&B TCI 
U£XT UATU 



Approved For Release 2003/03/: 


DP8I 


25X1 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

■>' 

F- "And from all I can gather from people who know the 

situation better than I do and I've been around the UN 
a great deal the last few days and, as you know, traveling 
around. It seems to me the Russians will fight only with 
a threat to their satellites. That's the only thing 
they'll fight over; in other words, I think they— I don't 
think they'll fight over the Middle East or I don't think 
they'll ever have any intention, myself—.” 

D- "They don't want to fight now if they can possibly avoid 
it.” 

F- "Yes.” 

D- "I don't know, some years hence it may be different but — .” 

F- "Some years hence, but pol icy ^w£r&s I think it serves 
their purpose to deny us the Middle East or compromise 
us or embarrass the Middle East if they can— 

D- "Sure." 

F- "But there is no great urgency on acquiring it for themselves 
in the same way because it's not a — ." 

D- "They'd like to deny the oil to us; they think that would 

weaken Europe a great deal, as it would. It wouldn't affect 
the United States so much except that we would have to share 
our oil with Europe and we haven't got enough to go around." 

- 2 - 

Approved For Release 2003/03/2&^eiiMRDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

y ' ' ' i 

• i 


"What did you think of that suggestion — I’ll just remind 
you because with so many papers, you may not remember 
where it's from or anything else that’s sent through, 
dropped in, that— -instead of trying to reconcile our 
differences on the basic policies but to start trimming 
them down in little places and do it behind the scenes 
first rather than a big open bef ore-the-world thing. 

The first thing would be to call off the dogs in counter- 
propaganda subversion in the Middle East and see how it 
works for a year's trial; if we would stop attacking 
their vital interests or pull in a bit that they would 
venture to do the same and give it a year's trial, if 
it didn't work, well, we'd go back to where we started. 
That was—." 


"Oh, I think there is a good deal in that. We're not— 
they're much better equipped, as a matter of fact, with 
their radio position in the Middle East than we. Radio 
Cairo on the Arab side is by far the most potent voice 
there is in the area and, after all, the great percentage 
of the educated Arabs are Egyptians. It just happens to 
be the case; I mean, you can't change that overnight. 
Therefore, they are able to put on more effective programs, 
by and large, than we are. I suppose in the radio field 


— 3 — 


Approved For Release 2OO3/O3/2$r0IAtf|DP8ORO1 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



they have an advantage over us. They have from time to 
time, they are very funny about that, they'll have a 
most ... campaign and then all of a sudden they will 
stop it. Then, you think, well, this is fine and then in 
about two weeks, they'll start it again; you don't quite 
know why they deny them one or the other." 

"Well, they have hinted through— not Malik himself— -but 
through his intermediary that they would like to have us 
consider a behind-the-scenes, off-the-record, agreement 
that they'll lay off if we'll lay off and give it a year's 
trial and see how it works and take the pressure off 
these areas because they say that—." 

"What does that mean? That we would lay off— you're 
talking about, say, about the Middle East now or are you 
talking about broader -areas or just about the Middle East?" 
"Well, they didn't specify. What they did specify was that 
'we'll lay off the Middle East if you lay off our vital 
interest.' Now, they didn't specify whether 'our vital 
interest* was the Middle East or the satellite countries." 
"If they mean that we'd have to stop all broadcasting of 
all kinds to the satellites, that would be pretty tough." 

"I don't think it was spelled out— I don't think they 
would expect us to do that because that would become too 
overt." 


-4- 

Approved For Release 2003/03f2$]Gp : RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

• ‘ 1 

■ ..... . 


D- "Yes," 

F- "I think what they mean is take the sting out of it 

and put forward purely cultural and that sort of thing, 

and then they would stop trying to undermine us," 

D- "As 1 understand it, our broadcast now to Poland is 
pretty much of that nature." 

F- "I talked to the Polish Ambassador the other night to the 
UN who is a very cultivated man and fellow who is a 
Catholic and he allowed us how that our program is very 
potent in Poland." 

D- "Potent." 

F- "Yes, he said he was — ." 

D- "Yes, I think it has been, but I think it's been quite 

careful; I mean, there has been no incitement to revolt 

and I think we've stopped a good deal of the old kind of 
attacks on Communism and so forth and so on, which just 
alone I don't think are very useful. I think you've got 
to— -and it would be hard to stop— if you did that, then 
the people in the satellite countries would think, 'Well, 
they've given us up. They've written us off for the time 
being, they've reached a deal with the Soviet Union.' 

The Middle East is another situation; I think that if we 
could quiet down the Middle East from every angle, it would 
be a very good thing." 


-5- 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28^ CIA-.RDP 

a ill* 1 




80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



F- "They will want their quid pro quo, that's the trouble 
with that." 

D- "Yes, 1 don't think that would be an equal quid pro quo 
really, just to have the Middle East against the whole 
satellite area. We're not anxious to incite the satellites 
to revolt, but we want to keep the sort of hope for freedom 
alive there and the radio is one of the few ways of doing 


it." 

F- "I've got two difficult speeches to make in Chicago in 

about two weeks time for the Council on Foreign Relations 
where they're having a tremendous turn-up. Adlai is one 
of the directors of it—." 

D- "Oh, yes, I know that, I know that." 

F- "And then another one that same night to a smaller group 
that is off-the-record. My problem is to say things that 
are interesting that is not — -go counter to policy and yet 
say a few things which may be private ideas and separate 
the two of them somehow." 

D- "Well, I'm sure you can do it, it's not too easy." 

F- "Oh, I'm sweating over it very hard." 

D- "The Council oti Foreign Relations in Chicago is an eminent 
body. I've known it for twenty-odd years. Who runs it 
now?" 

F- "Oh, I've got to — ." 


Approved For Release 2003/03/284piA^RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

ij- a ciU fl 




D- "Quincy Wright used to, Mr. and Mrs. Quincy Wright used to, 

I don*t know who runs it but he used to—." 

F- "I've got all the names in my briefcase, I've forgotten 
their names. The tenor of the thing will be more or less 
of a report; I was asked to make a report on the attitude 
of our allies and supporters and of the neutral or 
uncommitted countries towards us and why has it changed 
and try and analyze and report on why has the confidence 
in us lessened and what are the various views on how it 
can be re-established and as former. That is the gist—." 

D- "Of course, it differs a good deal from country to country. 
Our relations with Germany have kept on and with most of 
the members of NATO; there have been ups and downs with 
France because of the Algerian question and Tunisia and 
things of that sort. Our relations today with India, I 
think, are better than they were a couple of years ago." 

F- "But there is a sort of lessening of that sort of blind, 
almost idolagous, following of everything that we say 
must ... be right—." 

D- "Oh, yes, I don't know, do you think that ever really 
existed?" 

F- "At one time, we were the never-never land of hope and 
glory — 

-7- 

Approved For Release 2003/0q^h^lA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 :C]A-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 


D- "Yes, well, that was unrealistic, you know." 

F- "And now we've become human like the rest of them and 
only just a little more powerful and richer than the 
rest but just as human and just as capable of making 
mistakes. There is, I think, a certain lethargy and lack 
of enthusiasm growing." 

D- "Well, it depends a little bit on, I wouldn't quite go- 
take Italy, for example. Our relations with Italy are 
better than they were two years ago on the whole, I think. 
Some of the countries it is not the case; we've lost in 
certain areas of the Middle East, no doubt. We've lost 
in Egypt and in Syria." 

F- "One of the Israelis was telling me the other night the 
suggestion from the Israel standpoint, but he knows Arab 
countries well that he's been there and speaks perfect 
Arabic and he dines with them, he's friendly with them 
behind the scenes, he castigates them in the ON but behind 
the scenes, they dine together and are friends. The 
suggestion that from the whole Middle East psychology 
that if we were to continue to establish and even more 
forcefully establish our identification with their eventual 
welfare, not to take too seriously their sense of national- 
ism because nationalism is purely a word without a plan. 


- 0 - 

r: T r ?T 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIAJRllf*80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

-'M 


D- 


F- 


D- 


F- 


it hasn’t got a plan like in the more developed countries. 
It’s a spark put out by leaders who play musical chairs 
with each other— but that we would withdraw our physical 
presence. We will say 'now, that opens us up to military 
insecurity . 1 He was carrying on the argument that if we 
withdrew to African bases, the security is just the same 
because we could come in there just as quickly as the 
Russians who were withdrawn, but that our physical presence, 
although it has some advantages, has more disadvantages 
from the standpoint of propaganda against us." 

"I wonder what he means by physical presence? Where, for 
example? The only base we have, and that’s not very much 
of a base, is Dhahran. That doesn’t worry anybody very 
much because it way out there in the desert and has no 
effect on population, I mean- — 

"Whether he meant the moving in of the fleets and the 
show of physical power on their shores or not, I would/to 
say — I may be putting words into his mouth." 

"Yes, that was only done on one occasion when things 
looked pretty ... in Jordan — ." 

"There’s the threat of it, the sense that we’re prepared 
to interfere there rather than — ." 




-9- 

r-f.rcT 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



D- "We're the ones that haven't, the British and French 
interfered in Egypt—," 

F- "Well, he has the same thing to say about them as well." 

D- "And we've had no troops— we've put no troops in anywhere. 
We've sent very few arms, we sent some arms to Jordan but 
there isn't much American physical power presence right 
in the Middle East. As I say, we've got an air base in 
Dhahran but I've never heard anybody worry about that, 
it's way out there, it doesn't effect the people at all. 

We have no other air bases except for Turkey, of course." 

F- "No, he was excluding Turkey in his talk — ." 

D- "Yes." 

F- "He meant the Arab and Israel thing if we — whether he 
meant that more negotiations could be done between them 
by indirection rather than direction by ...—•" 

D- "We're trying to leave now, on this Israel i-Egypt i an thing, 
more and more to the countries themselves; I mean, you've 
got Saudi Arabia and Iraq and Jordan and Lebanon all feel 
more or less alike about it. We're still playing around 
with Egypt; that hasn't been written off finally, you know, 
and no reason to write it off. The Syrian thing is quieter 
than it was because they're having their own troubles 
internally and there are two groups in Syria that are 
beginning to contend inside Syria so that—." 

- 10 - 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28 :MDIA?4 


80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

• 'V -i 1 

F- "Of course, if the present group in Syria get thrown out, 
the Russians can say that we’ll say that we’ve done it, 
of course,, I suppose that’s the rebuttal of that whether--*" 

D- "Well, you’d have to throw out about three groups if you 
throw them out now; I mean, there are two or three 
different — ." 

F- "Did you read Sulzberger this morning in the Times ?" 

D- Yes, I’m kind of irritated at it. You know, these 

columnists — I would just like to give them about five 

minutes responsibility. There is not a concrete suggestion 

in there. I know Cy very well, but I really thought that 

was a pretty irritating sort of thing. Do you ever see 

dare 

them come out with a plan? They don’t/come out with a 
plan," 

F- "We used to say in my business that a critic is like a eunuch 
he can tell other people how to do it but can’t do it 
himself." 

D- Yes, I read Cy. Writing like Jehovah from a mountain top 
and there were quite a number of errors in the thing to 
boot, but still—. Cy is a good fellow but they think, 
they've got a pontificate and if they enjoy it, well and 
good. I’ve forgotten it myself, I remember reading it." 

- 11 - 

5T ’.f-pET 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

'.r':. ;:r 

O i 

Well, I think the gist of it was a kind of inconsistency 
in various places that we haven't — 

"Should foreign policy be consistent necessarily?" 

"I think—," 

"You can't—," 

I fhink that definitely there shouldn't be because 
circumstances change the art of ,,, — 

"*»» art or science and so forth. You have to ..." 

"He starts talking that it should be changed but at the 
same time, ,,," 

Yes, ,,, Well, the Question of unification of Germany 
is largely in the hands of the Germans and the Germans 
don’t want to unify on the present basis. You can't a 
majority of the Germans, and they've voted again and again 
these people like (Walter Lippman) , a great friend of mine 
they want an entirely new German policy. How are you 
going to get a new German policy? The German people don't 
want it," 

"But are they voting at the moment? I go to Germany and 
when I was there— I've been twice in Germany since I've 
seen you, I think, about two or three weeks ago, I don't 
know whether they are, at the moment, voting on the basis 
of East-West German policy or voting for staying on the 
right side for this moment," 


- 12 - 

Approved For Release 2003/03/^8 oGIA.,RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 




0- M Well, I don't know, I don't know. How can you tell, how 
can you tell, Cyrus—* .,,,«* --we were supposed to have 
settled both Cyprus and Algeria," 

F- "Well, that's pretty silly," 

D- "Oh, well, you have to live with them." 

F- "But the Germans, it seems to me, are so terrified of 

war, more terrified than almost anybody, that with a little 
push or a little more security in their own internal 
economy, a little more independence of movement, they 
might seriously threaten to withdraw either from NATO 
or neutralize their position in order: (a) to be kept 
out of trouble; and <b) , to settle the Eastern Germany 
thing, I talked to a great many different kinds of 
people who somehow or other always bring it up in a 
conversation. If they are against that idea, they will 
still acknowledge that it exists," 

D- "Well, I think that if you want to sell out to Russia, 
there are a great many things you can do and if all of 
Europe wants to become neutralized, which I think is a 
sell-out to Russia, it's just what Russia wants—.” 

F- "I think so, too, of course it is." 

D- "That's their choice. Europe and the United States together 
is a great deal stronger than Russia and I think we can 


-13- 


Prnm 

OjM 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : ClA-F 


80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



maintain that position. I think we're getting panicky. 

There is no reason in the world why we can't maintain that 
position and why Europe should say, 'All right, now, 
we'll be neutralized' —which means they're at the mercy 
of anything that Russia wants to do." 

F- "Somehow or other—." 

D- "We're not going to go to the support of a neutralized 
Europe." 

F- "Naturally not." 

D- "You can't—.” 

F- "But somehow or other— they * ve got an idea which someway 
or other we must counter, is that the basic row is between 
us and the Russians and that they are not really basically 
involved in it and what they must do is to-- now, that 
is not yet a majority opinion but it exists—." 

D- "Yes, I think that’s got to be countered in a way because—." 

F- "Somehow or other we failed to identify ourselves with 
them. They feel that we have identified them with us. 

You see what I mean?" 

D- "Yes, I think there is a good deal in that and I think 

maybe this NATO meeting ought to address itself to that." 

F- "I'm trying to spell that idea out in my speech but I 
haven't yet found the words of saying it." 


14 “ 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : (SIA-F 

\ 


P80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

V >•, i: - ; - , j 


"Yes, I think that that*s a—," 

"Simply and directly but I think that that is one of 
the—." 

"It*s very important because if they don't want this, 
if they don't want to maintain their own individual strength 
but look at France, going into atomic weapons now— they've 
got the choice and if they reach that decision, that is 
their decision and there is nothing for us to say about 
it. I don't think the majority of the Europeans have 
reached that decision. They know the Russians, they know 
what the Russians would do if they became neutralized. 

What power would they have? What power of decision? 
Everytime anything happened, Moscow would say, 'Well, 
we'll turn on our guided missiles.' Well, if Europe 
can say, 'All right, you turn on your guided missiles, 
we'll turn on ours,' nothing happens. If the Russians 
just say, 'We'll turn on our guided missiles,' and they 
have no answer, but hope that we're going to come then 
and fight their battle, I don’t know. I don't think the 
majority of them yet want that." 

"No, I don't think the majority do. All I'm saying is 
that I have a feeling and impression which gains all the 
time that that mood is growing rather than lessening. 


-15- 


V 1 

Approved For Release 2003/03/2fiM^4«)P80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



It s still a minority mood but even the majority who are 
against it acknowledge its existance, fear it, and also, 
when feeling in a argumentative mood, will put in an 
occasional word here and there supporting it. H 
Well, now, you take this last election in Germany where 
the issue was up and where Adenauer, whom I know quite 
well, and /Carlo Schmid/^ and others, they had that 
program— that was really their program in many ways and 
they made a miserable show of it. They had no real, it 
was no real campaign; it wasn't a battle, it was a rout—.' 
"But I don't think you—." 

"Because, by and large, when you analyze the thing, it 
doesn't make sense." 

"Yes, but I don't think the German elections were decided 
on that issue; I think they were decided on economic and 
other issues. That was one of them which I think they—." 
"Well, I don't know — there weren't any. What were the 
great economic issues that were up? Of course, they had 
a measure of prosperity, it's always easier, and they had 
quite a forceful candidate even though he was pretty old. 

I thought that was going to militate against him, it didn't 
seem to. You go back — read the history of Europe of over 
a century ago and you will find that times people took the 
same attitude with regard to Russia as they are doing now." 

- 16 - 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : ^IA^^80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/2^,eiA|RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

' - •' • ^ I . t" it 


F- "Yes, exactly, exactly. And immediately following the 
Napoleonic wars as well.** 

D- "Yes. Of course, Europe cut itself all up, thereby, 
laid itself open to Russia in two great wars," 

F- "Well, I don’t think that what we’ve done—." 

D- "But you can’t over estimate the Russians greatly, you 
know, you can't over estimate greatly," 

F- "No." 

D- "Where they have put their minds to it where they have 

gone into the guided missile thing, they’ve done extremely 
well. But they still have a country where the standard 
of living is deplorably low and they’ve been able to do 
nothing about that yet because they've spent so much of 
their progress on military. There is no indication that 
the Soviet are prepared to cut down their military establish- 
ment; they’ve dropped some of their ground forces off, 
they wanted an excuse to do that anyway and have done it 
voluntarily. Salzberger had the feeling of we've kind of 
lost the battle to the Russians and that isn't the case, 
you know," 

F- "In the same way as we've evolved basically a bipartisan 
attitude to foreign affairs we vary, between the parties 
on the method of application, but still we know what we’re 
for and what we're against internally— if we can achieve 

-J7- 

Approved For Release 2003/|j/^(|A-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 


that same thing as between the nations who are on our 
side in that sense of participation, let us assume that 
you are right insofar as the German question is concerned, 
how can eliminate the fact that an opposition will feel 
differently so that— in other words, to so persuade—." 

D- "Well, you can't eliminate that, you can't do that, there 
is always going to be differing views." 

F~ "Well, except, let's say, when during the Hitler threat 
which back in Paris it was less but which in its time was 
great. There was unanimity on the part of — that was not 
an issue between parties, everybody was against what they 
recognized as a major threat." 

D- "Yes." 

F- "And they all felt in the same thing together. Now, the 
parties in power in countries allied to us sympathize with 
us, but there are sizable minorities and groups within 
those countries who, maybe not be against us, but they 
are not for us either; they sort of just leave us alone— a 
real feeling that the row is between us and the Russians 
and that they are not really involved. It doesn't help 
anything to say that it's not true, but the point is that 
we haven't convinced them that it's not true yet. Somehow 
or other, we have not persuaded them that we’ve identified 
themselves with us." 


-13- 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28|:$1A-REP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : (|IA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 


D- "Yes, Of course, at the same time, Europe is terrified 
that we'll run off and make a deal with the Russians 
behind their backs." 

F- "Of course they are, sure," 

D- "And any suggestion of bilateral discussions is anathema. 
You'd think they'd say, 'Well, try to make a deal with 
the Russians, that will be fine.' On the contrary, and I 
think that goes to the opposition as well in most countries. 
Take on this disarmament thing, the Russians are very 
anxious naturally to talk with us. They say, 'You are 
the real problem, let's get down together.' Well, if we 
started that, there would be all hell to pay." 

F- "I don't think disarmament will get anywhere until the 
reasons for disarmament are reduced." 

D- "That's always been the case, I worked on disarmament in 
the 20s and the 30s. There hasn't been any real advance; 
Harold Stassen made an awful good attempt." 

F~ "Well, people arm as a result of fear. The point is to 
eliminate or reduce the fear and then a disarmament comes 
automatically whether there is a — ." 

D- "Here we are now with the Soviet menace in the guided missile 
field. Well, we've got to spend several billion more on 


-19- 


crf.pPT 

V.: IxX'j u L.iu i* 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

' i 

ii 

guided missiles. We've had the lead in the nuclear field 
and we still have it, but they're getting ahead of us in 
the guided missile field apparently." 

F- "Oh, I know what jfKennan' s,jf point was that if we, on the 
NATO, with nuclear weapons, it will make it impossible for 
the Russians to contemplate withdrawing from the satellites 
because they won't entrust their satellites with nuclear 
weapons; therefore, they will have to remain there in force 
until we do— that's the gist of the thing." 


D- 

"Yes." 



F- 

"Well. 

is there 

any—?" 

D- 

"Well, 

the other 

countries aren't quite satellites, they 


are going to look as though they are going to have them 

anyway. The British have them now and they have means of 

delivery by bombers. The French probably will have them, 

they ought not afford it probably but they probably will 

have them anyway; and, if the French have them, the Germans 

will have them. So, are you going to give them no adequate 

means of delivery, I mean, let them have the weapons but 

If 

not have the means of delivery? /They don't want these 
things, goodness knows, we're not going to force them on 
them. " 

F- "No." 


- 20 - 


Approved For Release 2003/03/2 


80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 


"But the clamor on the part of the governments is to get 
them and get them as soon as possible because then they 
think they will have an answer to the Russians. If the 
Russians threaten them with that they'll say, ’All right, 
you do that and we'll do it, too.' I think in a way maybe 
the salvation is that you will have this potential on 
both sides which will be so staggering that neither side 
could possibly win a war; that the damage that could be 
inf 1 icted— and I think that's getting more and more so 
with the guided missile. And we've got to arrange to have 
these guided missiles scattered around so there couldn't 
be-- and I think that would be perfectly feasible. We 
could have enough guided missile bases, it would be utterly 
impossible to knock them out all in half an hour or someth! 
of that kind. Then, your retaliatory force can be so great 
that the other fellow just can't risk it. If the Europeans 
go along with that, then you'll have a senseof great 
advantage over the Russians because you'll have a great 
network there and we'll be much nearer to them than they 
are to us. Not nearer to Europe, Europe would be just as 
near to them as they are to Europe but we'll have that 
advantage for the benefit of all. I don't think it is 
any time to adopt neutralism as an answer.” 


- 21 - 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : Cl, 


R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/2? : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

1 ‘-.A 


F- "Certainly not, but the point is how are we going to 

counteract it, that's ray argument. It's no time but it 
is growing partly out of fear, partly out of this thing 
in the dark, partly out of ignorance — 

D- "Well, is it growing? Now, I wonder whether as it 

was two or three years ago," 

F- "Well, I certainly would hesitate to — 

D- "You're over there and you see it." 

F- "Well, I'd certainly hesitate to debate anything in this 
department where certainly more knowledge comes in than 
anything I—." 

D- "Oh, no, no, it's interesting. It may be, I'd like—." 

F- "I can only report an impression gained rather than— can 
I borrow a match from you?" 

D- "Oh, excuse me, are there any matches in there? Some of 
them have none." 

F- "Yes, yes." 

D- "That is one?" 

F- "That is one that has some." 

D- "Some— one isn't some. Let's take a complete one. There 
is no doubt, you've got a problem in England that it is 
very possible, I suppose you would say it is probable, 
that if there were elections, the Labor Party would come 


- 22 - 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 :(plA-Rf^»80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 





25X1 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

,5, ■' i 

.• i 


25X1 


think he would like to get— be more responsible. I think 
there is, on the part of a lot of people throughout, even 
responsible people who publicly are on our side and 
privately another way. Their own pride, national pride, 
steps in the way and that they are becoming stooges of 
ours somehow or other; again, coming back to that somehow 
or other, where I don*t really know, is that we have 
failed to convince them that we are identified with their 
problems rather than we are making them — the US has got 
to be protected ... UN—," 

D- "Yes, I think you're very right on that. It ought not to 
be portrayed as a struggle between the United States and 
Russia because if we wanted to make a compromise at the 
expense of the rest of the world, we probably could make 
a fairly good compromise. I don't think it would last 
or be good for any length of time, but we have no intention 
of doing anything of that sort." 


- 25 - 


Approved For Release 2003/03/2$*: 


P80R01731 R00090001 0002-4 




Approved For Release 2003/03/28 i€1A-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

F- "Well, subordinate partners know they are subordinate 
partners and, unhappily, some way or other, they can 
quote chapter and verse on how they are sometimes made 
to feel they are subordinate and they say, *We know it 
ourselves, we don't have to be reminded." 

D- H I know it. That's very bad# I've always had the idea 
that Europe wou Id become a kind of an equal third force. 
Europe— Free Europe is a country of two hundred million 
people, more people than we have in the United States, 
and by and large, its level of intelligence and competence 
and so for and so on are equal. They haven't got quite 
the raw resources but still, with Africa and if they 
handle Africa right, they could have all that, too. So, 
there isn't any reason why, theoretically, you couldn't 
build up a Europe, plus such resources in Africa, as an 
equal third force in this picture which would be a marvelous 
thing. Because, by and large, it would be on our side, 
but not be on our side from the point of view of hanging 
on to our coattails. We'd have an independent view of 
things. That, we could live with, you know, and that 
would be fine and then we'd have— because vis-a-vis the 
Russians, we'd always really stand together." 

F- "Yes* If we can somehow get that thought through, which 
I think we are trying to do but somehow or other, it comes 
out wrong on the other end." 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA'-^P80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

lLi t 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

. - .. £*..:* j 

D~ "Yes, I think you're right because I think, so far, we 

have to deal with each one individually and then it becomes 
a question of their individual problems. In France it's 
Algeria, it’s Tunis, it*s so forth and these problems — 
but even if we don't have the relationships with MacMallin 
and with Selwyn Lloyd and the present British Government, 

I think it would be very good—." 

25X1 

F- "Very good indeed." 


-27- 

C',^ m '""'•is* ns* 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28£CJA-Rl|P80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 




Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

W .:: .-1 


D- "Yes. I know him well from his time over here. Tell me, 
how long are you going to be over here? What are your 
plans?” 

F- ”Well, I'm just down in Washington today to see you and 
the Navy this afternoon, Lewis Strauss, and I go back to 
New York and I'll be there until the 21st." 

D- "By the way, I've mentioned to Lewis that you and I were 
in touch—." 

F- "Oh, fine." 

D- "And that I'd seen you on this trip and so forth and so 

am H 

on. 


25X1 


-28- 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28- €iA*fpP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 


25X1 





* 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

D- "I think you’ll find no trouble there.” 

F- "How do you remember all those little things? How do 

you detatch that which you know everybody knows from the 
papers and that which you know that nobody else knows? 

Isn’t that a constant problem?" 

D- "Well, it is but, I don't know, it’s just something that—." 

F- "I remember FDR used to be the most insecure fellow in 

the work because he could never separate what he knew and 
what everybody else knew," 

D- "Of course, my difficulty is that you go out to dinner — 
and it's terribly difficult to tell what you've read in 
the newspapers and what you’ve read in the most secret 
telegrams. You read a lot in the T ime s and the Tribune 
and half a dozen papers—." 

F- "That's where FDR used to drop bricks all the time. 
Mountbatten used to do it, too," 

D- "I know, that's the hard thing." 

F- "He used to talk about operation code names right out loud in 
front of everybody. Everybody was just shivering, you 
weren't supposed to even breathe the name of it, of the 
operation, and he'd drop and catch himself. It seems often 
the higher you are, the more insecure you are." 

D- "It's difficult." 

-.30- 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28.^qiA;-f?DP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



25X1 


Approved For Release 2003/03/2? : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 


25X1 


25X1 


D- "This is out in Chicago?" 

F- "In Chicago." 

D- "When do you do that?" 

F- "On the 17th." 

D- "17th of December." 

F- "Yes." 

D- "I will." 

F- "I've got two speeches to make: one at lunch, the big one; 
and then an off-the-record one at night. Any trial balloons 
that you can wash your hands of later on and can say,*I 
don't know anything about it,' I'd be very glad to weave 
it in because it generally follows the policy." 

D- "I was going to get you to talk to — ." 

F- "And if you get any other—." 

D- "I hope to get to New York on— I'm going to be up there 
for a bit, let's see, a week from today I'm going to be 
in New York, I hope to be. I don't get up there ouch, I 
wish I could." 


- 31 - 


O™ jfST -- 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 ^G|A-RDR80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 




Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

: ij 


F- "Will you be up there just for one day or — ?" 

D- "I'm going to get off Sunday at noon and I've got to stay 
over for dinner Monday night, that's about all." 

F- "Oh, I'll be down in Georgia, I don't get back until 
Tuesday," 

D- 

F- "No, I'm director of Script© Ballpoint Pen—." 

D- "Oh, really?" 

F- "And I have to earn my keep as director from time to time 
and raise the stock back and show up at an occasional 
board meeting." 

D- "Well, that was an amusing trip we had, wasn't it? It was 
great fun, I enjoyed it — 

F- "Great fun, I saw—." 

D- "To meet you both and get to know you, it was really great 
fun. Stavros was down here the other day." 

F- "He's in New York now. I'm going to have dinner with him 
tomorrow." 

D~ "He's in New York and Janie is there and they're going to 
open their— I'm afraid I’m going to miss their art show." 

F- "I think it's tomorrow or the next day I'm supposed to go, 
I don't know whether I can or not." 


- 32 - 


CT 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28^* 




P80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 


D- "I'd like to see it. I, unfortunately, have got to go 
out to lunch. I had a lunch — I wanted you for lunch but 
I had this lunch before I--.” 

F- M Well, you’re awfully kind to have given me so much time 
and forgive me for being — 

D- M Now, don’t talk that way. I wonder if General Cabell is 
in. Do you know General Cabell?" 

F- "May I call Sherman Adams? He asked me to call when I — • 

D- "Sherman is in Europe," 

F- "Is he?" 

D- "He’s in your home town, I think. He’s in London." 

F- "He sent a cable and said call me when you get in town." 

D- "Well, I don’t think Sherman can possibly be back--." 

F- "Well, this was about two weeks ago when I knew that I 
was coming down here when he said that. Sherman Adams." 

D- "Oh, Sherman Adams? Oh, excuse me, I thought you said 
Sherman Kent." 

F- "No, Sherman Adams." 

D- "Do you want to call him?" 

F- "Well, his secretary. He just said to call when I leave 
you. He's a great fellow." 

D- "Are you lunching with him?" 


-33- 




V^.iiV ,> j 

1 .Ml ] 

Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28,:, CIA^RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

W- IjH W - UU M 


F- "No, he just told me to call when I leave you just to 
see what my plans were* 1*11 talk to his secretary* 

Thank you very much." 

D~ M I can give you a glass of milk* That's all I'm going 
to take.” 

F- "No, that's fine. I’ve got a luncheon at the Metropolitan 
Club* I'm going over now and see ..." 

D- "An old friend of mine. I've been a member since— for 
35 years now*" 

F- "No. You know who put me up was Bill (Castle). Do you 
remember him?" 

D- "Oh, do I— oh. Bill is around, you know. He's alive and 
kicking." 

F- "Is he?" 

D- "Oh, yes* Bill is a great fellow." 

F- "Is his wife still alive, do you know?" 

D- "Yes, Margaret is still alive and going strong." 

F- "She was very ill a couple of years ago*" 

D- "She is a great deal thinner than she used to be; of course, 
she could get thinner, you know." 

F- "Yes, she could." 

D- "Well, she is. She doesn't look at all well but she's going 
strong. Have you transportation?" 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CMRDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 


F - M I have outside.** 

D- "You have." 

F- "Yes, thanks very much, yes. I have a friend who has been 
acting as chauffeur. Allen, it was grand to see you and 
let me know if there is anything between now and the 17th 
and 1*11—." 


D- 


F- 


D- 


F- 

D- 


"I will, I have your address in New York?" 

"Yes, and anything else— when I go back over to the other 
side, 1*11 probably turn around and come back here in the 
end of January or February." 

"Oh, you will? Well, it was very interesting to get your 
views. There is a lot in— I understand what you say." 
"I'll send you a copy of the various speeches — ." 

"I don* t feel as discouraged as some people do, you know. 
There are a lot of problems but they've got a lot of 
problems, too, and to think what Kr. Khrushchev has on 
his mind— it's always well to think of that, you know. 

You might put a little of that in your speech. He's got 
to re-organize the industry of his country, he's got to 
try to run now— 'this socialized industry, when it gets as 
big as it is getting to be, it's very very hard to manage. 
When it's small and growing and growing ahead, but when 


— 35 — 


yH'T 

4 ** 


Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 




Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA.RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 

* t 

i 

i, ...n 1 


your problems begin and you get short of personnel here 
and laborors there and managers here and so forth and so 
on and get them all scrambled around and you've got 
agriculture on your hands and if you have a bad crop, 
you know, you*ve just had it." 

F- "Remember we talked once about what is the origin of 
policy, how is that done?” 

D- "Yes." 

F- "So, I've sort of being snooping around for opinions on 
that and I don't presume or suppose that it's anything 
you— -and it still doesn't answer the question, but all 
the answers came up the same that I got from those who 
should know — ." 

D- "Yes." 

F- "Which is that — it's surprising how much is that to just 
ordinary human discussion around a group of sixteen, that 
they will comment and idea will be put forth and sometimes 
on the spur of the moment and then .... sent down to be 
studied and then be sent back up again." 

D- "Yes." 

F- "But I don't suppose that's a particularly—." 

D- "They have a pretty good policy apparatus there in the 

Soviet, there's no question about that. That works pretty 
well." 

-36- 

Approved For Release 2003/03/2$ : CIA-RBP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 



Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4 






Approved For Release 2003/03/28 : CIA-RDP80R01 731 R00090001 0002-4